Results for 'T. M. Dak'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Anekāntavāda and Syādvāda.Rai Ashwini Kumar, T. M. Dak & Anil Dutta Mishra (eds.) - 1997 - Ladnun, Rajasthan: Jain Vishva Bharati Institute.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  58
    I_– _T. M. Scanlon.T. M. Scanlon - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301-317.
  3.  14
    What We Owe to Each Other.T. M. Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
    How do we judge whether an action is morally right or wrong? If an action is wrong, what reason does that give us not to do it? Why should we give such reasons priority over our other concerns and values? In this book, T. M. Scanlon offers new answers to these questions, as they apply to the central part of morality that concerns what we owe to each other. According to his contractualist view, thinking about right and wrong is thinking (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   173 citations  
  4. Contractualism and Utilitarianism.T. M. Scanlon - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 2: Theories About How We Should Live. Oxford University Press UK.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   140 citations  
  5. The Significance of Choice.T. M. Scanlon - 1982 - In Gary Watson (ed.), Free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  6. 3 Rawls on Justification.T. M. Scanlon - 2002 - In Samuel Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Rawls. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 139.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  7. The Diversity of Objections to Inequality.T. M. Scanlon - unknown
    This is the text of The Lindley Lecture for 1996, given by T.M. Scanlon, an American philosopher.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  8.  30
    Intention and Permissibility.T. M. Scanlon & Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74:301-338.
    [T. M. Scanlon] It is clearly impermissible to kill one person because his organs can be used to save five others who are in need of transplants. It has seemed to many that the explanation for this lies in the fact that in such cases we would be intending the death of the person whom we killed, or failed to save. What makes these actions impermissible, however, is not the agent's intention but rather the fact that the benefit envisaged does (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  9. The Significance of Choice.T. M. Scanlon - 1988 - In Sterling M. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Vol. 8, pp. 149-216). University of Utah Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  10.  43
    Intention and Permissibility.T. M. Scanlon & Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74:301-338.
    It is clearly impermissible to kill one person because his organs can be used to save five others who are in need of transplants. It has seemed to many that the explanation for this lies in the fact that in such cases we would be intending the death of the person whom we killed, or failed to save. What makes these actions impermissible, however, is not the agent's intention but rather the fact that the benefit envisaged does not justify an (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  11.  67
    Ethics and the Acquisition of Organs.T. M. Wilkinson - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    Transplantation is a medically successful and cost-effective way to treat people whose organs have failed--but not enough organs are available to meet demand. T. M. Wilkinson explores the major ethical problems raised by policies for acquiring organs. Key topics include the rights of the dead, the role of the family, and the sale of organs.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  12.  21
    Malebranche.T. M. Schmaltz - 2004 - Mind 113 (449):215-218.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  13. Preference and urgency.T. M. Scanlon - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):655-669.
  14.  76
    Replies.T. M. Scanlon - 2002 - Social Theory and Practice 28 (2):337-358.
  15. Reasons: A Puzzling Duality?T. M. Scanlon - 2004 - In R. Jay Wallace (ed.), Reason and value: themes from the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz. New York: Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  16. Rights, goals, and fairness.T. M. Scanlon - 1977 - Erkenntnis 11 (1):81 - 95.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  17. Replies.T. M. Scanlon - 2003 - Ratio 16 (4):424–439.
  18. Reply to Zofia Stemplowska.T. M. Scanlon - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):508-514.
    Describes the author’s value of choice account of responsibility and examines a response by Stemplowska to an objection to this account, raised by Alex Voorhoeve. Argues that the problem raised by Voorhoeve’s example concerns the way in which risk is taken into account in contractualism rather than the value of choice account of responsibility. Departs from the author’s earlier work in arguing that the risk of harm should sometimes be taken into account on an ex ante rather than an ex (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  19.  28
    Historical Inevitability.T. M. Knox - 1955 - Philosophical Quarterly 5 (19):189-189.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  20. Two conceptions of conceptualism and nonconceptualism.T. M. Crowther - 2006 - Erkenntnis 65 (2):245-276.
    Though it enjoys widespread support, the claim that perceptual experiences possess nonconceptual content has been vigorously disputed in the recent literature by those who argue that the content of perceptual experience must be conceptual content. Nonconceptualism and conceptualism are often assumed to be well-defined theoretical approaches that each constitute unitary claims about the contents of experience. In this paper I try to show that this implicit assumption is mistaken, and what consequences this has for the debate about perceptual experience. I (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  21. Reply to Leif Wenar.T. M. Scanlon - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):400-405.
    Explains how a contractualist moral theory can explain the moral phenomena commonly called rights, although it does not appeal to the notion of a right as a basic element of moral thinking, or explain the difference between rights violations and wrongs of other kinds. Argues that the latter failure is not an important fault.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  22. Reasons, responsibility, and reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh.T. M. Scanlon - 2002 - Ethics 112 (3):507-528.
  23.  60
    Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance.T. M. Scanlon - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):312.
  24.  27
    Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation.Yuki Kamide Gerry T. M. Altmann - 2009 - Cognition 111 (1):55.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  25.  17
    Hawthorne on knowledge and practical reasoning.T. M. Crisp - 2005 - Analysis 65 (2):138-140.
  26.  10
    Index.T. M. Scanlon - 2008 - In Thomas Scanlon (ed.), Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp. 243-247.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   86 citations  
  27. Wrongness and Reasons: A Re-examination.T. M. Scanlon - 2007 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Clarendon Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  28. The appeal and limits of constructivism.T. M. Scanlon - 2012 - In James Lenman & Yonatan Shemmer (eds.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  29.  25
    Presocratic theology.T. M. Robinson - 2008 - In Patricia Curd & Daniel Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press USA.
    If in the context of early and classical Greek thought, the term “theology” is taken to mean “of God/gods/the gods and his/their putative relationship, causal and directive, to the world and its operations, and to ourselves within that world,” or something of that order, the first ascription of such a notion to a Presocratic philosopher is to be found in Aristotle's comment that “Thales thought that all things are full of gods”. The Presocratic period ends with no neat causal sequence. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30.  25
    Reply to Gauthier and Gibbard.T. M. Scanlon - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):176-189.
    I am pleased by the degree of agreement about reasons between the three of us, which is much greater than I might have guessed. I have no objection whatever to the project of giving the kind of psychological description of deliberation about reasons that Gibbard proposes. I agree that “weighing X in favor of A isn’t mysterious,” but I do confess to some doubt about how a psychological description of this process of weighing “explains, indirectly, X’s counting in favor of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  31. Wrongness and Reasons: A Re-examination.T. M. Scanlon - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2:5-20.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  32. Responsibility and the value of choice.T. M. Scanlon - 2013 - Think 12 (33):9-16.
    ExtractImagine that you are struggling to finish a project, with the deadline fast approaching. Nearly done, you are about to print out what you have finished when a dialog box appears on your computer screen telling you that you must download and install an update for some piece of software. Frustrated, you try to make it go away, but it keeps reappearing. So you relent and click on ‘Install’, and your screen is filled with small print listing ‘Terms and Conditions’. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  33. Metaphysics and morals.T. M. Scanlon - 2010 - In Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. Cambridge University Press. pp. 7 - 22.
    This essay argues that normative judgments, in general, and moral judgments, in particular, are "truth apt" and can be objects of belief. Other main claims are: judgments about reasons, if interpreted as true, do not have metaphysical implications that are incompatible with a scientific view of the world. Two kinds of normative claims should be distinguished: substantive claims about what reasons people have and structural claims about what attitudes people must have insofar as they are rational. Employing this distinction, the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  34.  21
    Fragments.T. M. Heraclitus & Robinson - 1987 - Toronto ; Buffalo : University of Toronto Press.
  35. Rights, goals, and fairness.T. M. Scanlon - 1988 - In Samuel Scheffler (ed.), Consequentialism and its critics. New York: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  36.  42
    Counter-Manipulation and Health Promotion.T. M. Wilkinson - 2017 - Public Health Ethics 10 (3):257-266.
    It is generally wrong to manipulate. One leading reason is because manipulation interferes with autonomy, in particular the component of autonomy called ‘independence’, that is, freedom from intentional control by others. Manipulative health promotion would therefore seem wrong. However, manipulative techniques could be used to counter-manipulation, for example, playing on male fears of impotence to counter ‘smoking is sexy’ advertisements. What difference does it make to the ethics of manipulation when it is counter-manipulation? This article distinguishes two powerful defences of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  37.  89
    Précis of What We Owe to Each Other.T. M. Scanlon - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):159-161.
    1. The idea of a reason should be taken as the central notion for understanding desire, motivation, value, and morality. The argument of the book takes the idea of a reason as primitive. Nothing I go on to claim depends on the thesis that this notion cannot be explained in other terms, but I do not see how this could be done. It is often held that in all, or at least most, cases in which a person has a reason (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  38.  14
    Gettier and Plantinga's Revised Account of Warrant.T. M. Crisp - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):42-50.
  39. Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 3 Sen and consequentialism.T. M. Scanlon - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):39-50.
    It is a particular pleasure to be able to participate in this symposium in honor of Amartya Sen. We agree on a wide range of topics, but I will focus here on an area of relative disagreement. Sen is much more attracted to consequentialism than I am, and the main topic of my paper will be the particular version of consequentialism that he has articulated and the reasons why he is drawn to this view.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  40.  49
    Metaphysics and Morals.T. M. Scanlon - 2003 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 77 (2):7-22.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  41. Justice, Responsibility, and the Demands of Equality.T. M. Scanlon - 2006 - In Christine Sypnowich (ed.), The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen. Oxford University Press.
  42. Intention and permissibility, I.T. M. Scanlon - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.
    [T. M. Scanlon] It is clearly impermissible to kill one person because his organs can be used to save five others who are in need of transplants. It has seemed to many that the explanation for this lies in the fact that in such cases we would be intending the death of the person whom we killed, or failed to save. What makes these actions impermissible, however, is not the agent's intention but rather the fact that the benefit envisaged does (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  43. The Spin-Echo Experiments and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.T. M. Ridderbos & M. L. G. Redhead - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (8):1237-1270.
    We introduce a simple model for so-called spin-echo experiments. We show that the model is a mincing system. On the basis of this model we study fine-grained entropy and coarse-grained entropy descriptions of these experiments. The coarse-grained description is shown to be unable to provide an explanation of the echo signals, as a result of the way in which it ignores dynamically generated correlations. This conclusion is extended to the general debate on the foundations of statistical mechanics. We emphasize the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  44.  72
    Individual and family decisions about organ donation.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):26–40.
    abstract This paper examines, from a philosophical point of view, the ethics of the role of the family and the deceased in decisions about organ retrieval. The paper asks: Who, out of the individual and the family, should have the ultimate power to donate or withhold organs? On the side of respecting the wishes of the deceased individual, the paper considers and rejects arguments by analogy with bequest and from posthumous bodily integrity. It develops an argument for posthumous autonomy based (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  45. Wrongness and Reasons: A Re-examination.T. M. Scanlon - 2007 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume Ii. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  46. Keeping in touch by electronic mail.T. M. Dobson - 2002 - In Max Van Manen (ed.), Writing in the dark: phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry. London, Ont.: Althouse Press. pp. 98--115.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Education by any means necessary: An historical exploration of community-based pedagogical spaces for peoples of African descent.T. M. O. Douglas & C. M. Peck - 2013 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 49 (1):67-91.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Bytʹ chelovekom na zemle.T. M. Dzhafarli - 1968 - [Moskva,: "Mol. gvardii︠a︡,".
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Besedy o kommunisticheskoĭ morali.T. M. Dzhafarli - 1970 - Moskva]: Molodai︠a︡ gvardii︠a︡.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  21
    The Need for Dialogical Encounter: An Account of Christian Parents' Making Decisions on Behalf of Their Severely Handicapped Child.T. M. McConnell & R. A. McConnell - 2014 - Christian Bioethics 20 (3):376-389.
1 — 50 / 1000